Knowledge Engine for Data Science

Move models from experiment to reliable business impact.

Connect data quality, experiments, deployments, model health, and business outcomes into a reviewable operating path.

KEP

Model portfolio review

Review production model health and identify which issues threaten customer or business outcomes.

I connected model telemetry, data-quality checks, experiment history, incidents, product usage, costs, and outcome metrics. I’m preparing the portfolio brief now.

Production model health briefReport

58%

lower token cost

when using Knowledge Engine

2x

more tasks

vs. frontier models

32%

more accurate with open source

vs frontier model

19 of 34

tacit-knowledge facts captured

vs. RAG’s 1

Source: “Knowledge Engine Platform for Long-Horizon Professional Agents” and “Context Graphs for Recovering Tacit Organizational Knowledge”, Accrete AI, August 2026.

A model is only as reliable as the system around it.

Data scientists need trustworthy inputs, reproducible experiments, clear lineage, controlled releases, production monitoring, and business-outcome evidence. Those records often split across notebooks, pipelines, registries, tickets, dashboards, and people.

Data Science cognitive fabric

Connect the context behind the work.

Agents learn the language of the work, create the data flows that connect its systems, and build a living context graph for each request.

Agents learn your language

They learn your teams’ terms, shorthand, and ways of working, then create a shared understanding of what everything means.

Agents connect your systems

They create the data flows that bring the right information together for each task, without manual setup for every source.

Agents build the context graph

They connect people, records, decisions, and outcomes while preserving a clear path back to the source.

From domain language and source data to a context graphThe context model resolves jargon, synonyms, abbreviations, and intent into shared entities and relationships. Source mappings connect those concepts to tables and keys while agentic data pipelines prepare durable data. The resulting context graph can be virtualized over its sources or materialized.NATURAL-LANGUAGE REQUEST“Which model issuesthreaten customers?”CONTEXT MODELDomain languageJARGON · SYNONYMS · INTENTAUC→model qualitydrift→behavior changeintent: assess model riskCanonical modelENTITIES · RELATIONSHIPSModelSignalIssueEMITSTRIGGERSSemantic bindingsCONCEPT → SOURCE DATAModel→DatabricksSignal→DatadogIssue→Jiratables · columns · keysAGENTIC DATA PIPELINESCONTEXT GRAPHDatabricksDatadogJiraModelsMetricsIncidentsJOINModel contextChurn v4MODELDrift alertSIGNALEnterpriseSEGMENTDS-482ISSUEVIRTUALIZEDquery sources in placeMATERIALIZEDpersist selected subgraphs
The context model interprets a domain’s vocabulary, synonyms, abbreviations, and intents, then resolves natural-language requests to shared entities and relationships. Source mappings connect those concepts to tables, columns, keys, dialects, and execution integrations. KEP can query the resulting context graph virtually over source data or materialize selected graph data.
  • BigQuery
  • Snowflake
  • Databricks
  • AWS
  • Azure Cloud
  • Datadog

Workflows

Change the work, not just the interface.

01

Assess data and experiment readiness

Connect datasets, definitions, lineage, quality checks, experiment history, assumptions, and approvals before a model moves forward.

02

Monitor models and coordinate incidents

Bring together model, feature, pipeline, latency, cost, and product signals; investigate changes; and prepare a reviewed response plan.

03

Report business impact

Relate model behavior and experiments to product and business outcomes, then produce portfolio reporting with assumptions and confidence boundaries visible.

One end-to-end example

From isolated health alerts to a reviewed model response.

  1. 01

    Connect

    Gather model and feature telemetry, pipeline status, data quality, lineage, experiment history, code changes, incidents, costs, and outcome metrics.

  2. 02

    Analyze

    Establish the timeline, compare current behavior with baselines, trace upstream dependencies, and identify the evidence behind likely explanations.

  3. 03

    Deliver

    Create the health brief, affected-outcome view, investigation plan, owner list, and recommended release or rollback decision.

  4. 04

    Control

    Require authorized review before retraining, promoting, rolling back, changing data, or altering a production decision path.

What the team gets

Outcomes people can inspect and use.

Readiness and experiment brief

Data, lineage, assumptions, evaluation, risks, approvals, and reproducible evidence for the proposed work.

Model health investigation

Timeline, affected systems, likely causes, confidence boundaries, owners, and recommended response.

Business-impact report

Model and experiment outcomes connected to product, operational, financial, or risk measures.

The Accrete product

Context, work, and control in one path.

The Knowledge Engine connects data, experiments, production behavior, and business outcomes into governed work while complementing existing data and ML platforms.

Start with one workflow

Define the outcome before expanding the system.

Bring the workflow, its information sources, its approval requirements, and the result your team needs. We’ll map a focused first deployment and the path to reuse.

Discuss this workflow